The Of State cannabis reform is putting social justice front and center

Companies will still not be able discriminate against someone for their status as a qualifying patient using medical cannabis. However the costs will likewise disallow an employer from holding against a staff member making use of cannabis items before work unless it would put the company in offense of a federal contract or trigger it to lose federal financing.

Like alcohol usage on the task, an employer can still take employment action versus workers upon a "sensible suspicion" of substance abuse on the job or if the worker manifests "specific, articulable symptoms of drug problems". But these provisions do not use at all to the exempt company or exempt positions.

And employers with a policy forbiding substance abuse might have more flexibility as well. If a candidate or a staff member (who is not otherwise exempt from the guidelines) tests favorable for marijuana state before beginning the task, it can not be used as the basis to decline to work with or to fire the staff member unless specific conditions are developed.

You, your employees, and the legalization of marijuana

Excitement About Cannabis legalization in Canada - FAQ

Frankly, there's far even more about this than might be nicely fit into a brief article. Suffice to say that companies will have to train managers and human resources on how to handle this completely new enforcement location.  View Details  remain in a brave new worldlegal cannabis is here to stay.

10 Most Influential Legalization Groups

He is also the author of the independent Connecticut Employment Law Blog Site. The blog discusses new and noteworthy events in labor and employment law on a day-to-day basis. Filed Under:.

The very first part of the title of this post is the heading of this significant new Politico piece, and the second part draws on this recent brief book evaluation that I recently authored for The Federalist Society blog. I was evaluating Judge Jeffrey Sutton's majestic, in which the judge highly develops and records why "some matters ought to not be nationalized" while urging a "restored appreciation for the virtues of localism." In my (too quick) review, I worried the importance of these localism styles for drug policy throughout United States history, and I highlighted this remarkable 1921 Atlantic piece by journalist Louis Graves discussing how alcohol prohibition most successfully gotten adherents from a "gradual building up of dry sentiment" at the local level until "Federal interference ...